Research Resources & RSS Feeds

Background and Objectives Alzheimer disease (AD) is neuropathologically classified into 3 corticolimbic subtypes based on the neurofibrillary tangle distribution throughout the hippocampus and association cortices: limbic predominant, typical, and hippocampal sparing. In vivo, a fourth subtype, dubbed “minimal atrophy,” was identified using structural MRI. The objective of this study was to identify a neuropathologic proxy for the neuroimaging-defined minimal atrophy subtype. Methods We applied 2 strategies in the Florida Autopsied Multi-Ethnic (FLAME) cohort to evaluate a neuropathologic proxy for the minimal atrophy subtype. In the first strategy, we selected AD cases with a Braak tangle stage IV (Braak IV) because of the relative paucity of neocortical tangle involvement compared with Braak >IV. Braak IV cases were compared with the 3 AD subtypes. In the alternative strategy, typical AD was stratified by brain weight and cases having a relatively high brain weight (>75th percentile) were defined as minimal atrophy. Results Braak IV cases (n = 37) differed from AD subtypes (limbic predominant [n = 174], typical [n = 986], and hippocampal sparing [n = 187] AD) in having the least years of education (median 12 years, group-wise p < 0.001) and the highest brain weight (median 1,140 g, p = 0.002). Braak IV cases most resembled the limbic predominant cases owing to their high proportion of APOE 4 carriers (75%, p < 0.001), an amnestic syndrome (100%, p < 0.001), as well as older age of cognitive symptom onset and death (median 79 and 85 years, respectively, p < 0.001). Only 5% of Braak IV cases had amygdala-predominant Lewy bodies (the lowest frequency observed, p = 0.017), whereas 32% had coexisting pathology of Lewy body disease, which was greater than the other subtypes (p = 0.005). Nearly half (47%) of the Braak IV samples had coexisting limbic predominant age-related TAR DNA-binding protein 43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change. Cases with a high brain weight (n = 201) were less likely to have amygdala-predominant Lewy bodies (14%, p = 0.006) and most likely to have Lewy body disease (31%, p = 0.042) compared with those with middle (n = 455) and low (n = 203) brain weight. Discussion The frequency of Lewy body disease was increased in both neuropathologic proxies of the minimal atrophy subtype. We hypothesize that Lewy body disease may underlie cognitive decline observed in minimal atrophy cases.

Background and Objectives Accumulation of tau pathology in Alzheimer disease (AD) correlates with cognitive decline. Anti-tau immunotherapies were proposed as potential interventions in AD. While antibodies targeting N-terminal tau failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy in prodromal-to-mild AD, their utility at other disease stages was not evaluated in prior studies. Lauriet is a phase 2 study of an anti-tau monoclonal antibody, semorinemab, in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. Methods The phase 2 Lauriet study included a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind period, during which participants with mild-to-moderate AD received 4,500 mg of IV semorinemab or placebo every 4 weeks for 48 or 60 weeks. Participants who chose to continue in the subsequent optional open-label extension received 4,500 mg of semorinemab every 4 weeks for up to 96 weeks. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to week 49 or 61 on the 11-item version of the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog11) and the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) scale. Secondary efficacy endpoints included change from baseline on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamic effects were also evaluated. Results Between December 3, 2018, and February 27, 2020, 624 individuals were screened, 272 participants were randomized, and 238 were included in the modified intent-to-treat population (received ≥1 dose(s) of study medication and underwent baseline and ≥1 postbaseline assessment(s)). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. At week 49, the semorinemab arm demonstrated a 42.2% reduction (–2.89 points, 95% CI –4.56 to –1.21, p = 0.0008) in decline on the ADAS-Cog11 (coprimary endpoint) relative to the placebo arm. However, no treatment effects were observed on the ADCS-ADL scale (coprimary endpoint; absolute difference between the 2 treatment arms in the ADCS-ADL score change from baseline of –0.83 points, 95% CI –3.39 to 1.72, p = 0.52) or on the MMSE or CDR-SB (secondary endpoints). Semorinemab was safe and well tolerated. Discussion Based on the results of the prespecified coprimary endpoints, this study was negative. While semorinemab had a significant effect on cognition measured by the ADAS-Cog11, this effect did not extend to improved functional or global outcomes. These results may warrant further exploration of semorinemab or other anti-tau therapies in mild-to-moderate AD. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class I evidence that semorinemab does not slow functional decline in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. Trial Registration Information The Lauriet study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03828747, and EudraCT 2018-003398-87.

Background and Objectives Recent advances in blood-based biomarkers offer the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer disease (AD), but additional research in diverse populations is critical. We assessed the profiles of blood-based AD biomarkers and their relationships to cognition and common medical comorbidities in a biracial cohort. Methods Participants were evaluated through the Mayo Clinic Jacksonville Alzheimer Disease Research Center and matched on age, sex, and cognitive status. Plasma AD biomarkers (β-amyloid peptide 1–42 [Aβ42/40], plasma tau phosphorylated at position 181 [p-tau181], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], and neurofilament light) were measured using the Quanterix SiMoA HD-X analyzer. Cognition was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess for differences in plasma biomarker levels by sex. Linear models tested for associations of self-reported race, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and vascular risk factors with plasma AD biomarker levels. Additional models assessed for interactions between race and plasma biomarkers in predicting cognition. Results The sample comprised African American (AA; N = 267) and non-Hispanic White (NHW; N = 268) participants, including 69% female participants and age range 43–100 (median 80.2) years. Education was higher in NHW participants (median 16 vs 12 years, p < 0.001) while APOE 4 positivity was higher in AA participants (43% vs 34%; p = 0.04). We observed no differences in plasma AD biomarker levels between AA and NHW participants. These results were unchanged after stratifying by cognitive status (unimpaired vs impaired). Although the p-tau181-cognition association seemed stronger in NHW participants while the Aβ42/40-cognition association seemed stronger in AA participants, these findings did not survive after excluding individuals with CKD. Female participants displayed higher GFAP (177.5 pg/mL vs 157.73 pg/mL; p = 0.002) and lower p-tau181 (2.62 pg/mL vs 3.28 pg/mL; p = 0.001) levels than male participants. Diabetes was inversely associated with GFAP levels (β = –0.01; p < 0.001). Discussion In a biracial community-based sample of adults, we observed that sex differences, CKD, and vascular risk factors, but not self-reported race, contributed to variation in plasma AD biomarkers. Although some prior studies have reported primary effects of race/ethnicity, our results reinforce the need to account for broad-based medical and social determinants of health (including sex, systemic comorbidities, and other factors) in effectively and equitably deploying plasma AD biomarkers in the general population.